Posts Tagged ‘nilpotency class’

Links to previous parts of this post: part (1), part (2), part (3). As usual, we denote by Z(G) the center of a group G.

In part (2), we defined the lower central series \gamma_n(G), \ n \ge 0, of a group G and showed that G is nilpotent if and only if \gamma_n(G)=(1). We now define the upper central series of G and prove a similar condition for a group to be nilpotent.

Definition. The upper central series of a group G is an ascending chain of subgroups \{Z_n(G)\}_{n \ge 0} of G defined inductively as follows

Z_0(G)=(1), \ \ \ \ Z_n(G)/Z_{n-1}(G)=Z(G/Z_{n-1}(G)), \ \ \ n \ge 1.

Remark 1. Note that since Z_0(G)=(1) is a normal subgroup of G, and Z(G/Z_{n-1}(G)) is a normal subgroup of G/Z_{n-1}(G), we get by induction that every Z_n(G) is normal in G.

Remark 2. If Z_k(G)=Z_{k+1}(G) for some k \ge 0, then Z_n(G)=Z_k(G) for all n \ge k. That’s because, by induction,

Z_n(G)/Z_{n-1}(G)=Z(G/Z_{n-1}(G))=Z(G/Z_k(G))=Z_{k+1}(G)/Z_k(G)=(1).

Lemma. Let G be a group, and let H be a subgroup of G. If N is a normal subgroup of G, then [H,G] \subseteq N if and only if HN/N \subseteq Z(G/N),

Proof. Clearly HN/N \subseteq Z(G/N) if and only if [HN/N,G/N]=1_{G/N} if and only if [HN,G] \subseteq N. Now, if [HN,G] \subseteq N, then [H,G] \subseteq [HN,G] \subseteq N. Conversely, suppose that [H,G] \subseteq N, and let h \in H, g \in G, a \in N. Then

\begin{aligned}[ha,g]=haga^{-1}h^{-1}g^{-1}=(hah^{-1})(hga^{-1}g^{-1}h^{-1})(hgh^{-1}g^{-1})=(hah^{-1})(hga^{-1}g^{-1}h^{-1})[h,g] \in N,\end{aligned}

because N is normal and [h,g] \in [H,G] \subseteq N. So [HN,G] \subseteq N. \ \Box

Theorem. Let G be a group.

i) [Z_n(G), G] \subseteq Z_{n-1}(G) for all integers n \ge 1.

ii) If G is nilpotent, and (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n=G is a central series in G, then G_i \subseteq Z_i(G) for all 0 \le i \le n.

iii) If Z_n(G)=G, for some integer n \ge 0, then (1)=Z_0(G) \subseteq Z_1(G) \subseteq \cdots \subseteq Z_n(G)=G is a central series in G.

iv) G is nilpotent if and only if Z_n(G)=G for some integer n \ge 0.

v) \gamma_n(G)=(1) if and only if Z_n(G)=G.

Proof. i) Use the Lemma with H=Z_n(G), \ N=Z_{n-1}(G).

ii) The proof is by induction. For i=0, we have (1)=G_0=Z_0(G). Suppose now that the result holds for some i \ge 0 with i+1 \le n. Then, by Remark 2 in the first part of this post, [G_{i+1},G] \subseteq G_i and so, by our induction hypothesis, [G_{i+1},G] \subseteq Z_i(G). Hence, applying the Lemma with H=G_{i+1}, \ N=Z_i(G), we get that

G_{i+1}Z_i(G)/Z_i(G) \subseteq Z(G/Z_i(G))=Z_{i+1}(G)/Z_i(G)

and so G_{i+1} \subseteq G_{i+1}Z_i(G) \subseteq Z_{i+1}(G), which completes the induction.

iii) We have the normal series (1)=Z_0(G) \subseteq Z_1(G) \subseteq \cdots \subseteq Z_n(G)=G, which is clearly a central series because Z_{i+1}(G)/Z_i(G)=Z(G/Z_i(G)), by definition.

iv) If G is nilpotent and (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n=G is a central series, then G=G_n \subseteq Z_n(G), by ii), which gives Z_n(G)=G. Conversely, suppose that Z_n(G)=G for some integer n \ge 0. Then, by iii), (1)=Z_0(G) \subseteq Z_1(G) \subseteq \cdots \subseteq Z_n(G)=G is a central series and so G is nilpotent.

v) Suppose first that \gamma_n(G)=(1), and let G_i:=\gamma_{n-i}(G), \ 0 \le i \le n. Then, by part iv) of the Theorem in the second part of this post, (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n is a central series in G, and so, by ii),

G=\gamma_0(G)=G_n \subseteq Z_n(G),

which gives Z_n(G)=G. Conversely, if Z_n(G)=G, then, by iii),

(1)=Z_0(G) \subseteq Z_1(G) \subseteq \cdots \subseteq Z_n(G)=G

is a central series in G. Thus, by part iii) of the Theorem in part (2) of this post, \gamma_n(G) \subseteq Z_0(G)=(1) hence \gamma_n(G)=(1). \ \Box

Remark 3. In part (2) of this post, we defined the nilpotency class of a nilpotent group G as the smallest integer n \ge 0 such that \gamma_n(G)=(1). So, by part v) of the above theorem, G is a nilpotent group of class n if and only if Z_n(G)=G.

To learn about finite nilpotent groups, see this post!

See part (1) and part (2) of this post here and here, respectively.

In part (2) of this post, we defined the lower central series of a group G and proved that G is nilpotent if and only if \gamma_n(G)=(1) for some n \ge 0. We are now going to use this result to prove some facts about nilpotent groups.

Fact 1. Every subgroup of a nilpotent group is nilpotent.

Proof. Let G be a nilpotent group, and let H be a subgroup of G. We first prove that \gamma_i(H) \subseteq \gamma_i(G) for all i. The proof is by induction. That is clear for i=0 because \gamma_0(H)=H \subseteq G=\gamma_0(G). If the inclusion holds for i, then

\gamma_{i+1}(H)=[\gamma_i(H), H] \subseteq [\gamma_i(G),G]=\gamma_{i+1}(G),

which completes the induction. Now, since G is nilpotent, \gamma_n(G)=(1) for some integer n \ge 0. Thus \gamma_n(H) \subseteq \gamma_n(G)=(1) and so \gamma_n(H)=(1), implying that H is nilpotent. \Box

Fact 2. Let G be a group, and let H be a normal subgroup of G.

i) If K is a group, and f: G \to K is a group homomorphism, then \gamma_i(f(G))=f(\gamma_i(G)) for all i \ge 0.

ii) If G is nilpotent, then G/H is nilpotent.

Proof. i) The proof is by induction. We have \gamma_0(f(G))=f(G)=f(\gamma_0(G)) and so the equality holds for i=0. Now, if the equality holds for i, then

\gamma_{i+1}(f(G))=[\gamma_i(f(G)),f(G)]=[f(\gamma_i(G)), f(G)]=f([\gamma_i(G),G])=f(\gamma_{i+1}(G)),

which completes the induction.

ii) Let f: G \to G/H be the natural group homomorphism. Since G is nilpotent, \gamma_n(G)=(1) for some integer n \ge 0, and so, by i), \gamma_n(G/H)=f(\gamma_n(G))=f((1))=(1), implying that G/H is nilpotent. \Box

Remark 1. Let G be a group with a normal subgroup H. In Theorem 1, ii), in this post, we showed that G is solvable if and only if both H,G/H are solvable. In Remark 1 in the first part of this post, we showed that every nilpotent group is solvable. However, it is not true that if both H, G/H are nilpotent, then G is nilpotent too. For example, the symmetric group S_3 is not nilpotent, by Example 3 in the first part of this post, but both A_3,S_3/A_3 are nilpotent because they are abelian. However, if H is in the center of G, and G/H is nilpotent, then, as the next fact shows, G is nilpotent too.

Fact 3. Let G be a group with the center Z(G).

i) If H \subseteq Z(G) is a subgroup of G and G/H is nilpotent, then G is nilpotent.

ii) \gamma_n(G/Z(G))=(1) if and only if \gamma_{n+1}(G)=(1).

Proof. i) Note that H is normal in G because H \subseteq Z(G). Now, let f: G \to G/H be the natural group homomorphism. Since G/H is nilpotent, \gamma_n(G/H)=(1) for some integer n \ge 0. But, as we showed in the proof of Fact 2, (1)=\gamma_n(G/H)=f(\gamma_n(G)) and so \gamma_n(G) \subseteq \ker f=H. Thus

\gamma_{n+1}(G)=[\gamma_n(G),G] \subseteq [H,G]=(1),

because H \subseteq Z(G), and so \gamma_{n+1}(G)=(1).

ii) We showed in i) that if \gamma_n(G/Z(G))=(1), then \gamma_{n+1}(G)=(1). Suppose now that \gamma_{n+1}(G)=(1). Then [\gamma_n(G),G]=\gamma_{n+1}(G)=(1) and so \gamma_n(G) \subseteq Z(G). Hence, if f: G \to G/Z(G) is the natural group homomorphism, then, by Fact 2, i),

\gamma_n(G/Z)=\gamma_n(f(G))=f(\gamma_n(G)) \subseteq f(Z(G))=(1),

and so \gamma_n(G/Z)=(1). \ \Box

Remark 2. In part (2) of this post, we defined the nilpotency class of a nilpotent group G as the smallest integer n \ge 0 such that \gamma_n(G)=(1). So, by Fact 3, ii), G \ne (1) is a nilpotent group of class n if and only if G/Z(G) is a nilpotent group of class n-1. As the next Fact shows, this result may be used to prove nilpotency certain groups are nilpotent.

Fact 4. Let G_1, \cdots, G_n, \ n \ge 2, be groups and let G:=G_1 \times G_2 \times \cdots \times G_n. Then G is nilpotent if and only if each G_i is nilpotent.

Proof. By induction over n, we only to prove the result for n=2. Suppose first that G is nilpotent, and let H_1:=G_1 \times (1), \ H_2:=(1) \times G_2. Then H_1,H_2 are normal subgroups of G and we have the group isomorphisms G/H_1 \cong G_2, \ G/H_2 \cong G_1. Thus, by Fact 2, ii), both G_1,G_2 are nilpotent.
Conversely, suppose that G_1,G_2 are nilpotent of class n_1,n_2, respectively, and let n:=\max\{n_1,n_2\}. We prove, by induction over n, that G is nilpotent of class n. It is clear for n=0 because then G_1=G_2=(1), and so G=(1). Also, if n=1, then both G_1,G_2 are abelian and at least one of them is non-trivial. Thus G is a non-trivial abelian group hence nilpotent of class 1. Suppose now that n \ge 2, and consider the natural group homomorphism

f: G=G_1 \times G_2 \to G_1/Z(G_1) \times G/Z(G_2).

Clearly f is onto and \ker f=Z(G_1 \times G_2). Thus G/Z(G) \cong G_1/Z(G_1) \times G_2/Z(G_2). By Remark 2, G_1/Z(G_1), G_2/Z(G_2) are nilpotent of class n_1-1,n_2-1, respectively. So, by induction, G/Z(G) is nilpotent of class \max\{n_1-1,n_2-1\}=\max\{n_1,n_2\}-1, and hence, by Remark 2, G is nilpotent of class \max\{n_1,n_2\}. \ \Box

Fact 5 (The Normalizer Condition). Let G \ne (1) be a nilpotent group, and let H be a subgroup of G. If H \subset G, then H \subset N(H), where N(H) is the normalizer of H in G.

Proof. Suppose, to the contrary, that H=N(H). Since G is nilpotent, \gamma_n(G)=(1) for some integer n \ge 1 (note that we can’t have n=0 because G is non-trivial). Thus \gamma_n(G) \subseteq H. We also have that \gamma_0(G)=G \ne H. So there exists an integer k \ge 1 which is minimal with respect to this property that \gamma_k(G) \subseteq H. Hence

[\gamma_{k-1}(G),H] \subseteq [\gamma_{k-1}(G),G]=\gamma_k(G) \subseteq H,

and so \gamma_{k-1}(G) \subseteq N(H)=H, contradicting minimality of k. \ \Box

See part (4) of this post here.

See part (1) of this post here.

Recall that given subgroups H,K of a group G, we denote by [H,K] the subgroup of G generated by all the commutators [x,y], \ x \in H, \ y \in K, where, as always, [x,y]:=xyx^{-1}y^{-1}.

Definition 1. The lower central series of a group G is a descending chain of subgroups \{\gamma_n(G)\}_{n\ge 0} of G defined inductively as follows

\gamma_0(G)=G, \ \ \ \ \gamma_{n}(G)=[\gamma_{n-1}(G), G], \ \ \ \ \forall n \ge 1.

So \gamma_1(G)=[\gamma_0(G),G]=[G,G]=G', \ \gamma_2(G)=[\gamma_1(G),G]=[G',G], etc.

Theorem. Let G be a group.

i) \gamma_n(G) is a normal subgroup of G for all integers n \ge 0.

ii) \gamma_n(G) \subseteq \gamma_{n-1}(G) for all integers n \ge 1.

iii) If G is nilpotent, and (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n=G is a central series in G, then \gamma_i(G) \subseteq G_{n-i} for all 0 \le i \le n.

iv) If \gamma_n(G)=(1), for some integer n \ge 0, and G_i:=\gamma_{n-i}(G), \ 0 \le i \le n, then the following is a central series in G: \ (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n=G.

v) G is nilpotent if and only if \gamma_n(G)=(1) for some integer n \ge 0.

Proof. i) We prove it by induction over n. It obviously holds for n=0 because \gamma_0(G)=G. Now suppose that n \ge 1 and \gamma_{n-1}(G) is normal in G. To show that \gamma_n(G) is normal in G, note that since, by definition, \gamma_n(G)=[\gamma_{n-1}(G), G], we only need to show that a[x,b]a^{-1} \in \gamma_n(G) for all a,b \in G, \ x \in \gamma_{n-1}(G), which is easy because

\begin{aligned}a[x,b]a^{-1}=axbx^{-1}b^{-1}a^{-1}=(axa^{-1})(aba^{-1})(ax^{-1}a^{-1})(ab^{-1}a^{-1})=[axa^{-1},aba^{-1}] \in [\gamma_{n-1}(G),G],\end{aligned}

because \gamma_{n-1}(G) is normal in G which gives axa^{-1} \in \gamma_{n-1}(G).

ii) Since \gamma_n(G)=[\gamma_{n-1}(G),G], we only need to show that [x,a] \in \gamma_{n-1}(G) for all x \in \gamma_{n-1}(G) and a \in G. We have

[x,a]=xax^{-1}a^{-1}=x(ax^{-1}a^{-1}) \in \gamma_{n-1}(G),

because, by i), \gamma_{n-1}(G) is normal in G and so ax^{-1}a^{-1} \in \gamma_{n-1}(G).

iii) We prove it by induction over n. It obviously holds for i=0 because G_n=G=\gamma_0(G). Now suppose that the inclusion holds for some i \ge 0, and suppose that i+1 \le n. Then

\gamma_{i+1}(G)=[\gamma_i(G),G] \subseteq [G_{n-i},G] \subseteq G_{n-(i+1)},

by Remark 2 in the first part of this post.

iv) By i), ii), (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n=G is a normal series. We also have that

[G_{i+1},G]=[\gamma_{n-i-1}(G),G]=\gamma_{n-i}(G)=G_i

for all 0 \le i \le n-1. Thus, by Remark 2 in the first part of this post, the series is central.

v) If G is nilpotent, and (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n=G is a central series in G, then, by iii), we have \gamma_n(G) \subseteq G_0=(1), and so \gamma_n(G)=(1). Conversely, suppose that \gamma_n(G)=(1) for some integer n \ge 0. Then, by iv), (1)=G_0 \subseteq G_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq G_n=G, where G_i:=\gamma_{n-i}(G), \ 0 \le i \le n, is a central series in G and hence G is nilpotent. \Box

Definition 2. Let G be a nilpotent group. By the last part of the above Theorem, \gamma_n(G)=(1) for some integer n \ge 0. The smallest integer n \ge 0 such that \gamma_n(G)=(1) is called the nilpotency class of G.

Remark. Since for a group G, we have \gamma_0(G)=G, \ \gamma_1(G)=[G,G]=G', the commutator subgroup of G, we get from Definition 2 that the trivial group has nilpotency class 0 and non-trivial abelian groups have nilpotency class 1.

See the next part of the post here.