See part (1) and part (2) of this post here and here. All rings, as usual, are assumed to have identity.
So far, we have defined the Jacobson radical of a ring and we have given some basic results and examples. In this post, we go a little deeper and look at some cases where the Jacobson radical is nil or nilpotent.
Let be a left ideal of a ring. Recall that we say is nil if for every there exists some positive integer such that We say that is nilpotent if for some positive integer i.e. for all Clearly if is nilpotent, then is also nil.
Fact 1. The Jacobson radical of a ring contains every nil left ideal of the ring.
Proof. Let be a nil left ideal of a ring Let Then and so is nilpotent. Hence for some positive integer and so is the inverse of Thus is invertible for all and so
The next fact is about the Jacobson radical of a left Artinian ring. I give two versions of the fact: the first one is weak and it says the Jacobson radical is nil but the second one is strong and it says the Jacobson radical is in fact nilpotent. The reason for doing that is because sometimes we only need the weak version, which is much easier to prove.
Fact 2. Let be a left Artinian ring. Then
i) is nil,
ii) is in fact nilpotent.
Proof. i) Let and consider the descending chain of left ideals Since is left Artinian, there exists a positive integer such that and so for some Hence and so because and so is invertible.
ii) Let and consider the descending chain of ideas Since is (left) Artinian, there exists an integer such that for all In particular, We show that So suppose, to the contrary, that and consider the set
Since we have and so Since is left Artinian, has a minimal element, say Since we have and therefore there exists such that In particular, Let Then both are in and both are contained in Thus, by minimality of we must have and so Hence for some and that gives But is invertible because and so gives which is a contradiction.
Now suppose that is a field, and is a -algebra. So is a vector space over and thus we can talk about If is finite, then is Artinian and hence, by the first part of Fact 2, is nil. Amitsur extended this result to -algebras for which
Fact 3. (Amitsur) Let be a field, and let be a -algebra. If as cardinal numbers, then is nil.
Proof. See this post.
Again, suppose that is a field, and is a -algebra. Recall that we say is algebraic (over ) if it is a root of some nonzero polynomial in We say that is an algebraic algebra if every element of is algebraic. Obviously, if is finite, then is algebraic.
Fact 4. Let be a field, and let be a -algebra. Let If is algebraic, then is nilpotent. In particular, the Jacobson radical of every algebraic algebra is nil.
Proof. Let be a polynomial such that So and hence
Now, is invertible because and so gives
Remark. Since, by Fact 1, the Jacobson radical contains every nil (left) ideal, saying the Jacobson radical is nil is equivalent to saying the Jacobson radical is the largest nil ideal of the ring.
Next, we give examples of rings whose Jacobson radical is zero, see it here.